tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post6459009366351168825..comments2023-06-22T21:49:43.188-07:00Comments on The world observed through eyes that see: The Da´ath board - flat earth zetesisBarca de Lunahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comBlogger31125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-13083382974874192822017-11-27T06:20:18.359-08:002017-11-27T06:20:18.359-08:00I thought Maya meant - knowing. So many web sites ...I thought Maya meant - knowing. So many web sites stating different meanings to the same words. Even dictionaries vary. What a mess.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320948229370370917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-17733023794179298212017-11-01T01:09:03.786-07:002017-11-01T01:09:03.786-07:00As mentionened in my text I am always open for new...As mentionened in my text I am always open for new information. If you are indeed an expert in these fields, could you maybe name your top three reasons/ examples/ evidences for a spherical (or near spherical) Earth, this would enable me to focus my rsearch time. Thanks, Michael.Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-20391012139683948742017-11-01T01:07:19.176-07:002017-11-01T01:07:19.176-07:00Dieser Kommentar wurde vom Autor entfernt.Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-27904107181355136832017-10-31T01:38:37.230-07:002017-10-31T01:38:37.230-07:00Ahh yeah ok mate. The reason no one argues about ...Ahh yeah ok mate. The reason no one argues about the Earth being a sphere anymore is because we have transcended this mystery already even back in Plato's and Aristotle's time. <br /><br />I'm a Hydrographic Surveyor by trade working all over the world and use highly precise GPS satellite orbits to conduct operations such as mapping large areas of seabed, laying 100s of kms of susbsea cable, moving rigs 1000s of kms aross the Earth's surface. All these real world applications can only be done with highly precise and accurate mathemetics analysing carrier wave radio signals from strategically placed orbiting satellites around a spheroidal Earth. Instead of spending all your time researching mythology go research Geomatics, Projections, Spheroids and the maths behind it. You will soon see that Earth being spheroidal and the technology and mathematics built around it actually is being applied in real-world operations to lay subsea fibre optic cable and telecommunications across oceans to provide you with access to the internet which you use to study your beloved mythology and zodiacs, and to put your wild theories onto Blogs. Which of course have a place, but you must also broaden your research and use some reason.<br /><br />MichaelMishkin Golovinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00550475938295346213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-67244250833897330932017-10-31T01:17:50.944-07:002017-10-31T01:17:50.944-07:00Ahh yeah ok mate. The reason people don't que...Ahh yeah ok mate. The reason people don't question obvious things like the Earth is a sphere is because we have Transcended that mystery even since before Plato's and Aristotle's time. Our knowledge is evolving at varied rates as we traverse the galactic plane but we are still evolving nonetheless.<br /><br />And for current world views - my own. I am a hydrographic surveyor who relies on accurate satellite orbits to map large areas of seabed, lay hundreds of kms of subsea cable across oceans, rig moves over long distances and all these operations require precise highly accurate mathematics to solve real world problems based on the Earth being a spheroid shape. <br /><br />Go look up anything to do with geomatics, projection, spheroids and you'll get a grasp that the mathematics is very accurate and its the reason we can build telecommunications, lay optic fibre cable across oceans so people like yourself can have access to amazing information via the internet.<br /><br />So technically, you are correct, its not a perfect sphere but it's not far off. Too much time spent in studying books and research to support your arguments than getting out into the world and realising it yourself. <br /><br />MichaelMishkin Golovinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00550475938295346213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-5596126136029762582017-09-16T12:00:13.336-07:002017-09-16T12:00:13.336-07:00Yes ofc. And i have seen it already a long time ag...Yes ofc. And i have seen it already a long time ago.<br />But he's not telling the truth so much and not revealing anything, <br />that can't be already seen by oneself.<br /><br />Apologies if the topic is too petty, i can understand that.<br />I had a feeling there was much more to it and i was hoping you'd already discovered that, which i coulnd't.<br />I am probably just wrong.<br /><br />Keep it up and bless you!<br />j<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-54001979983350815482017-09-14T23:37:02.505-07:002017-09-14T23:37:02.505-07:00Hi there, the linked article is full of nonsense. ...Hi there, the linked article is full of nonsense. I dont even know where to start. there are no quantum particles, we are not in a digital simulation, the Moon does not cause eclipses, light has no speed and our planet is not moving. Sep 23, 2017 is no special date at all. It marks the beginning of the fall season. Much more important is the fact that Saturn enters Capricorn later this year, and consecutively Aquarius in 2,5 years. Combine this with the 248-year Pluto cycle and you will see that in 2024 we will see the next cycle of 1776. Gruss aus FrankfurtBarca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-38360803912086316622017-09-14T13:14:58.025-07:002017-09-14T13:14:58.025-07:00Hi Barca,
one more, completely different question:...Hi Barca,<br />one more, completely different question:<br />I found very interesting thoughts in your Blog over the last years.<br />Thanks.<br />What do you think about this constellation?<br />September 23, 2017<br />https://squawker.org/analysis/eerie-truth-september-23-2017-americas-destruction-foretold/<br />I'm very interested about your astronomical view.<br />Thanks for every statement.<br />Gruss aus SchwabenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-26116360300824303572017-09-12T05:31:49.641-07:002017-09-12T05:31:49.641-07:00acceleleration is the exact opposite of force. Thr...acceleleration is the exact opposite of force. Throw a ball in the air, this requires force. The ball will then accelerate downwards without any further force input. Magnitude does not have inertia....in fact it is also the opposite! Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-82754817287138474172017-09-12T05:28:37.199-07:002017-09-12T05:28:37.199-07:00here is the producer explaining himself. This was ...here is the producer explaining himself. This was a 30 second research.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsPlPohPa1cBarca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-65994521321676641322017-09-11T15:45:14.627-07:002017-09-11T15:45:14.627-07:00And now for something completely different:
A whil...And now for something completely different:<br />A while ago you asked your readers, what they'd like to see in the near future on your blog.<br />I hope not be a too-late comer, but i'd love to read your take or even analysis on the "I Pet goat 2" project:<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n_xCI-peq0 <br /><br />It has such a depth to it, that i always wondered, what it could mean on it's deeper layers.<br />Who would be the possible real source of such a remarkable work of self-glorification or even propaganda or whatever it really is?<br /><br />Best regards,<br />jAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-30533904650477127922017-07-29T07:45:51.574-07:002017-07-29T07:45:51.574-07:00not that i agree with "flat earth" model...not that i agree with "flat earth" models...<br />to much lunatics and nonsense<br />but you forget to mention the chestahedron heart model of Frank Chester<br />to me that will be an interesting topic<br />to me anything in creation is basically spherical, because it evolves out of a central point that is electrically accelerating, growing in all directions given shape by the magnitudes inertia, pulse out and pulse in for the balance, like the breath and "heartbeat", only gods heartbeat has no limits... neither do we (I and my Father are One) but we (most of us) have no clue ;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-8627130924525725132017-07-28T00:40:48.853-07:002017-07-28T00:40:48.853-07:00Disagree strongly. The microcosmos is man, so the ...Disagree strongly. The microcosmos is man, so the firmamewnt here would be your skull dome. In the macrocosmos, the formament is a crystaline, glasslike barrier, just like you have around a snow globe. Now, to guide you concerning sources, MPH`s STOAA is a great reference work but it is purely descriptive. Descriptions are not explanations, this work is not an explanatory one. Not a single spiritual concept is explained in this book, because it is merely a descriptive reference guide. The escond source that you mention is a book so ridden with error and nonsense that you should not quote it at all. Blavatsky/ Theosophy is a poisoned path and Blavatsky was merely a mdeium. Medium are the very lowest end of the spiritual chain, because they merely act as reflecting surface. Blavatsky never unveils Isis in her book, have you not noticed? You are on a very good path in reading these works but you need to develop your scrutiny on what to trust and what to believe. The way you do this is by studying astrology, the master science. HOTEP Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-26124657575881769352017-07-27T01:26:28.678-07:002017-07-27T01:26:28.678-07:00Em macrocosmically firmament is aether, microcosmi...Em macrocosmically firmament is aether, microcosmicaly is understood differently, but since you write about flat earth we are talking about macrocosmos. About aether (firmament) read from madame Blavatsky Isis unveiled pages 111-136. You also make mistakes with daath, so about this read at least from Manly Palmer Hall - Secret teachings of all ages from pages 117 forward. I appreciate your work, but sorry you have mixed too many things. Of course it is possibility that also I have mixed something.<br /><br />So, please enlighten me then what is the firmament according to your understanding..........Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-39545243534403126852017-07-25T02:43:30.008-07:002017-07-25T02:43:30.008-07:00yes, it is dart board and the UN logo has 33 field...yes, it is dart board and the UN logo has 33 fields, which is the Masonic signature for this trick.Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-63603323105979026422017-07-25T02:40:29.522-07:002017-07-25T02:40:29.522-07:00The Ether, or 5th element, is NOT the firmament me...The Ether, or 5th element, is NOT the firmament mentioned in scriptures. Now please stop writing comments like "you did not do your research properly". This is insulting.Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-68455564313301276962017-07-17T05:44:18.650-07:002017-07-17T05:44:18.650-07:00So quite like the UN Logo tells us in plain sight:...So quite like the UN Logo tells us in plain sight:<br />https://www.qwant.com/?q=un%20logo&t=images<br /><br />With a globe model in one's head, one would think, that it pictured a globe viewed from above the north pole and being stretched out in 2D. <br />But if one would just look at it without any previous presumptions, it's a dartboard, isn't it. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-52413024269665285802017-07-15T13:36:07.044-07:002017-07-15T13:36:07.044-07:00Eh, I just wanted to help you a little. You did no...Eh, I just wanted to help you a little. You did not do your research properly. I told you Tesla's quote is fake. You don't know what is firmament.....I hope you research more for your own good. Regards.<br /><br />Here is excerpt from a book Pythagoras and Delphic mysteries from Edouard Schure about firmament explained in a different way. I hope you will understand:<br /><br />We have just seen that modern natural philosophy, in order to explain the world, has been obliged to recognize an imponderable, universal agent, that it has even proved its presence, and, in this way, without knowing it, has fallen in with the notions of ancient theosophies. Let us now try to define the nature and function of cosmic fluid in accordance with the philosophy of occultism in all ages. On this main principle of cosmogony, Zoroaster is in agreement with Heraclitus, Pythagoras with Saint Paul, the Kabbalists with Paracelsus. Cybele-Maïa reigns everywhere, the mighty soul of the world, the vibrating and plastic substance which the breath of the creative spirit uses at its will. Her oceans of ether serve to cement together all the worlds. She is the great mediator between the invisible and the visible, between spirit and matter, between the within and the without of the universe.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-43091008868025125012017-07-07T00:59:19.200-07:002017-07-07T00:59:19.200-07:00This is also a possibility and not so far off from...This is also a possibility and not so far off from Egyptian texts. Santos teaches that this mirror world also has 7 orbs, and points towards death, while our part has 7 orbs and reaches higher, the other reaches lower...Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-37847083468416865302017-07-06T13:02:16.466-07:002017-07-06T13:02:16.466-07:00I appreciate that you do not attempt to define wha...I appreciate that you do not attempt to define what the actual shape of the earth is.<br />What creeps me out about this notion is that I can't help but think that we are currently living on one side of this magnetic inertial plane. Therefore wouldn't that mean there would be another side to it that would be on the inertial plane of the polar opposite end of the toroid? And if so that means there's another side of the earth plane that we cannot access through known means. Perhaps this is another aspect of the underworld (duat). these are just some thoughts this entry stirred in me. thanks again for another insightful entry. Rauha! Hotep.taivaannaulahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05150451314665132157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-69311784094672725092017-07-05T03:17:28.332-07:002017-07-05T03:17:28.332-07:00Hi I will not publish your other spam messages. Go...Hi I will not publish your other spam messages. Go and write your own blog. Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-54976024521761566592017-07-04T15:46:20.290-07:002017-07-04T15:46:20.290-07:00I will try to correct the other anonymous who repl...I will try to correct the other anonymous who replied and said that MAYA is an illusion and you who asked if I want to die and not even understand where I am, because those two things go hand in hand. MAYA is god's "illusive" power. The word illusion comes from two Latin words il ludo - to play. So MAYA is God's creative power to come from oneness to multiplicity to play his game - drama of creation (creation is play in creas (flesh in Greek). God creates his play so he sacrifices his w(holy) oneness and bifurcates into polarity. Inside himself he creates firmament - unsubstiantial virgin (because he became "two" without sex) matter (mother) ISIS (MAYA) the first womb from where physical creation emerges. Then through ISIS's womb is born visible matter NEPHYTIS (which is actually still ISIS or AUSET just different aspect of her because now she is visible matter). All these neters are actually principles of one god so their relationships (mother, sister, father, wife) vary from situation from where you look at different aspect of them. Through them he creates visible universe inside himself and comes to life through their product - natural world (so one god gets involved into natural world through involution phase. And only in man he can through evolution phase become conscious of himself and reflect back that he started his cosmic play - lila, drama, karma, mara as unconscius animal and becomes fully conscious as God. So when you grasp only that and become awake, you know that your physical body is always in god and there is no death. The Egyptians said that we are now spiritually dead, until our souls awaken from slumber.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-1924513645543404962017-07-02T09:40:57.203-07:002017-07-02T09:40:57.203-07:00Hello I like everything you write, thanks for your...Hello I like everything you write, thanks for your blog.<br />You are right no one knows how our land is really today<br /><br />Here is an interesting video : <br />https://youtu.be/ss7QT6uCZdUAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-40435015561252418332017-06-27T03:56:39.777-07:002017-06-27T03:56:39.777-07:00Disagree strongly. Also, Makov may be intersting r...Disagree strongly. Also, Makov may be intersting read on things like feminism, but not on deeper, spiritual topics. The shape of the Earth is a spiritual topic, meaning, it requires a deeper understanding of reality. Makov is not the right source in this case. "seeking heaven" in its original connotation meant that people should use their brain.Barca de Lunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05137992835540098858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-169581735204051502.post-2161600672578367802017-06-26T04:39:59.408-07:002017-06-26T04:39:59.408-07:00Thanks for replying. I think, the hollow earth the...Thanks for replying. I think, the hollow earth theory is by no means less plausible than the flat theory, so maybe you should check it out. In my point of view, the whole flat earth story is a psyop: https://www.henrymakow.com/2016/02/Flat-Earth-Psyop.html There are too many unsovled problems like the one I mentioned and as long as I can't find a logical explanation for at least one of them, I don't know why I should prefer the flat earth model over another one. But maybe Kant was right: "Let every man seek heaven in his own fashion". Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com